File Compression & Encryption:
Website: WinRAR
Our file compression and decompression tests were split into two halves to cover a broad spectrum of performance. The first test we ran was to compress and encrypt a 176MB MPEG-2 source file with the highest quality compression ratio. Secondly, we compressed and encrypted the folder of 400 photographs with the same compression settings.
-
Gigabyte GA-MA790GP-DS4H
-
Gigabyte GA-MA78G-DS3H
-
Asus CrossHair II
-
Asus M3A32-MVP Deluxe
0
25
50
75
100
125
150
175
Time in seconds (lower is better)
-
PCI-Express Graphics
-
Integrated Graphics
-
Gigabyte GA-MA790GP-DS4H
-
Gigabyte GA-MA78G-DS3H
-
Asus CrossHair II
-
Asus M3A32-MVP Deluxe
Time in seconds (lower is better)
-
PCI-Express Graphics
-
Integrated Graphics
Again the AMD 790GX is slightly slower than the slightly more expensive AMD 790FX and nForce 780a, although faster than the 780G that uses a lower power processor. The difference is not much - a couple of seconds at best.
File Decompression & Decryption:
The two RAR archives created during the compression and encryption tests were then decompressed and decrypted.
-
Gigabyte GA-MA790GP-DS4H
-
Gigabyte GA-MA78G-DS3H
-
Asus CrossHair II
-
Asus M3A32-MVP Deluxe
Time in seconds (lower is better)
-
PCI-Express Graphics
-
Integrated Graphics
-
Gigabyte GA-MA790GP-DS4H
-
Gigabyte GA-MA78G-DS3H
-
Asus CrossHair II
-
Asus M3A32-MVP Deluxe
Time in seconds (lower is better)
-
PCI-Express Graphics
-
Integrated Graphics
In decompression tests the 790GX is again slightly slower than the nForce 780a and 790FX, but still a slight bit faster than the 780G between the two tests, however there's very little difference across the field.
Want to comment? Please log in.